Comparison Of Methods For Measuring Shockduration

but.event.date27.04.2017cs
but.event.titleStudent EEICT 2017cs
dc.contributor.authorKunz, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-07T09:40:31Z
dc.date.available2020-05-07T09:40:31Z
dc.date.issued2017cs
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares a linear interpolation, an interval and a sine interpolation method for measuring mechanical shock duration. All methods are analysed to find differences and limitations. Then methods are tested on simulated and real shock shapes to confirm analysis results. We discovered that the sine interpolation method is very robust to noise, however is sensitive to shock shape changes. The linear interpolation method accuracy is influenced by noise, however this method works also on high noise level (SNR = 0 dB). The interval method provides consistent results up to some noise level (SNR > 10 dB), where it stops working.en
dc.formattextcs
dc.format.extent436-440cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the 23st Conference STUDENT EEICT 2017. s. 436-440. ISBN 978-80-214-5496-5cs
dc.identifier.isbn978-80-214-5496-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11012/187141
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherVysoké učení technické v Brně, Fakulta elektrotechniky a komunikačních technologiícs
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 23st Conference STUDENT EEICT 2017en
dc.relation.urihttp://www.feec.vutbr.cz/EEICT/cs
dc.rights© Vysoké učení technické v Brně, Fakulta elektrotechniky a komunikačních technologiícs
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.subjectmechanical shocken
dc.subjecthalf-sine shocken
dc.subjectduration measurementen
dc.subjectlinear interpolation methoden
dc.subjectinterval methoden
dc.subjectsine interpolation methoden
dc.titleComparison Of Methods For Measuring Shockdurationen
dc.type.driverconferenceObjecten
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
eprints.affiliatedInstitution.departmentFakulta elektrotechniky a komunikačních technologiícs
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
436_eeict2017.pdf
Size:
595.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: