AL SALMAN, A. Telecommunication Education Environment and its Optimal Usage [online]. Brno: Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta elektrotechniky a komunikačních technologií. 2009.

Posudky

Posudek vedoucího

Škorpil, Vladislav

Mr. Salman Ahmed makes your bachelor thesis very faithfully. He visited laboratory place very often and gets three new laboratory manuals. Every manual contents task for students, description for lectors and exemplary protocol. It is important, that stress is putted to student´s understanding of problems and not only to mechanical procedure of measuring. I was very managed with his access to bachelor thesis. Mr. Salman Ahmed works hard and independently and his thesis have all attributes for successful defence.

Dílčí hodnocení
Kritérium Známka Body Slovní hodnocení
Splnění zadání A 45/50
Aktivita během řešení a zpracování práce (práce s literaturou, využívání konzultací, atd.) A 19/20
Formální zpracování práce A 18/20
Využití literatury A 9/10
Navrhovaná známka
A
Body
91

Posudek oponenta

Vychodil, Petr

The candidate confirmed a very good orientation, as well as general knowledge of key issues. He also displayed required skills in Telecommunication Instructional Modelling System (TIMS) and designed three laboratory tasts. The thesis is written in English which is good enough; some legends of pictures are missing, the candidate also used different typeface throughout the thesis (e.g. pages 7 and 13), as well as some schemes have different bodrers. He compared individual versions of biskit, and described their advantages and disadvantages very well. The practical output is presented by a few laboratory exercises, which develop students´ creativity. Each exercise has two parts- the first one is intended for students, the second one for teachers. It is accompanied by detailed documentation of every exercise, including the working procedure. Mr. Salman came up with very interesting tasks- Quadrature Phase Shift Keving (QPSK), Signal Constelation and Eve Patterns. To sum up, the thesis is on the appropriate level of proficiency, and therefore I classify it with excellent- A.

Dílčí hodnocení
Kritérium Známka Body Slovní hodnocení
Splnění požadavků zadání A 20/20
Odborná úroveň práce A 45/50
Interpretace výsledků a jejich diskuse A 18/20
Formální zpracování práce B 8/10
Navrhovaná známka
A
Body
91

eVSKP id 29830