Influence of the gripping fixture on the modified compact tension test results: evaluation of the experiments on cylindrical concrete specimens

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2015-12-18
ORCID
Advisor
Referee
Mark
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
VŠB-TUO
Altmetrics
Abstract
The modified compact tension test (MCT) might become in the future a stable test configuration for the evaluation of fracture-mechanics parameters or also for description of fatigue behavior of composites materials such as concrete. Core drilling is used for sampling of existing structures. These samples have cylindrical shape with the selected thickness to avoid the stress concentration. This contribution focuses on the evaluation of the fracture behavior during static and quasi static tests. Static tests are performed on standard specimen with diameter 150 mm and length 300 mm. The quasi-static tests are performed using two different gripping fixtures. The results for quasi-static tests are represented as L-COD diagrams (i.e. load vs. crack opening displacement) measured on the loading axis. The comparison of results and discussion of advantages and disadvantages are introduced.
The modified compact tension test (MCT) might become in the future a stable test configuration for the evaluation of fracture-mechanics parameters or also for description of fatigue behavior of composites materials such as concrete. Core drilling is used for sampling of existing structures. These samples have cylindrical shape with the selected thickness to avoid the stress concentration. This contribution focuses on the evaluation of the fracture behavior during static and quasi static tests. Static tests are performed on standard specimen with diameter 150 mm and length 300 mm. The quasi-static tests are performed using two different gripping fixtures. The results for quasi-static tests are represented as L-COD diagrams (i.e. load vs. crack opening displacement) measured on the loading axis. The comparison of results and discussion of advantages and disadvantages are introduced.
Description
Citation
Transactions of the VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Civil Engineering Series. 2015, vol. 15, issue 2, p. 1-11.
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/tvsb.2015.15.issue-2/tvsb-2015-0010/tvsb-2015-0010.xml?format=INT
Document type
Peer-reviewed
Document version
Published version
Date of access to the full text
Language of document
en
Study field
Comittee
Date of acceptance
Defence
Result of defence
Document licence
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Citace PRO