Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurger, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorWellhausen, Jens
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-26T10:18:10Z
dc.date.available2019-06-26T10:18:10Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-01cs
dc.identifier.citationMendel. 2017 vol. 23, č. 1, s. 171-178. ISSN 1803-3814cs
dc.identifier.issn2571-3701
dc.identifier.issn1803-3814
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11012/179214
dc.description.abstractTwo main approaches on sampled control are compared, the descrete equivalent design and the direct discrete design. Both design methods are used to implement a control system for a real plant, DC-motor. It is shown that discrete equivalent design works well with su cient high sampling rates and that direct discrete design works nearly independent of sampling time.en
dc.formattextcs
dc.format.extent171-178cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherInstitute of Automation and Computer Science, Brno University of Technologycs
dc.relation.ispartofMendelcs
dc.relation.urihttps://mendel-journal.org/index.php/mendel/article/view/69cs
dc.subjectdiscrete controlen
dc.subjectPI-controlleren
dc.subjectstate space controlen
dc.subjectobserveren
dc.subjectfeedforward controlen
dc.subjectstructure with two degrees of freedomen
dc.titleEmpirical Casestudy on Approaches to Sampled Controlen
eprints.affiliatedInstitution.facultyFakulta strojního inženýrstvícs
dc.coverage.issue1cs
dc.coverage.volume23cs
dc.identifier.doi10.13164/mendel.2017.1.171en
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.driverarticleen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record