How Do Grass Species, Season and Ensiling Influence Mycotoxin Content in Forage?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSkládanka, Jiřícs
dc.contributor.authorAdam, Vojtěchcs
dc.contributor.authorDoležal, Petrcs
dc.contributor.authorNedělník, Jancs
dc.contributor.authorKizek, Renécs
dc.contributor.authorLindušková, Hanacs
dc.contributor.authorMejía, Jhonny Edison Albacs
dc.contributor.authorNawrath, adamcs
dc.coverage.issue11cs
dc.coverage.volume10cs
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-04T11:03:48Z
dc.date.available2020-08-04T11:03:48Z
dc.date.issued2013-11-01cs
dc.description.abstractMycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by fungal species that have harmful effects on mammals. The aim of this study was to assess the content of mycotoxins in fresh-cut material of selected forage grass species both during and at the end of the growing season. We further assessed mycotoxin content in subsequently produced first-cutting silages with respect to the species used in this study: Lolium perenne (cv. Kentaur), Festulolium pabulare (cv. Felina), Festulolium braunii (cv. Perseus), and mixtures of these species with Festuca rubra (cv. Gondolin) or Poa pratensis (Slezanka). The mycotoxins deoxynivalenol, zearalenone and T-2 toxin were mainly detected in the fresh-cut grass material, while fumonisin and aflatoxin contents were below the detection limits. July and October were the most risky periods for mycotoxins to occur. During the cold temperatures in November and December, the occurrence of mycotoxins in fresh-cut material declined. Although June was a period with low incidence of mycotoxins in green silage, contents of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone in silages from the first cutting exceeded by several times those determined in their biomass collected directly from the field. Moreover, we observed that use of preservatives or inoculants did not prevent mycotoxin production.en
dc.formattextcs
dc.format.extent6084-6095cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfcs
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2013, vol. 10, issue 11, p. 6084-6095.en
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph10116084cs
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601cs
dc.identifier.other145193cs
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11012/181132
dc.language.isoencs
dc.publisherMDPIcs
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthcs
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/11/6084cs
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unportedcs
dc.rights.accessopenAccesscs
dc.rights.sherpahttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1660-4601/cs
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/cs
dc.subjectgrassen
dc.subjectsilageen
dc.subjectmycotoxinen
dc.subjectenvironmental factoren
dc.titleHow Do Grass Species, Season and Ensiling Influence Mycotoxin Content in Forage?en
dc.type.driverarticleen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
sync.item.dbidVAV-145193en
sync.item.dbtypeVAVen
sync.item.insts2020.08.04 13:03:48en
sync.item.modts2020.08.04 12:15:55en
thesis.grantorVysoké učení technické v Brně. Středoevropský technologický institut VUT. Chytré nanonástrojecs
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ijerph1006084.pdf
Size:
237.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
ijerph1006084.pdf
Download
Collections
Chytré nanonástroje